Skip to content

Return to the Full Article View You can republish this story for free. Click the "Copy HTML" button below. Questions? Get more details.

Self-Managed Abortions Gain Attention, but Helpers Risk Legal Trouble

At a recent rally in Nashville, Tennessee, Planned Parenthood organizer Julie Edwards looked out at some of the “back-alley abortion” imagery on signs, including bloody coat hangers. Edwards reminded the crowd, driven into the streets by the U.S. Supreme Court’s June 24 decision on abortion rights, that it’s not like the old days before Roe v. Wade.

Nearly a decade ago, Edwards was a teenager and got medication from older friends to end an unintended pregnancy.

“I’m standing in front of you having had a self-managed abortion, having gotten abortion pills from people in my community. And I’m safe,” Edwards said to cheers. “It’s going to take all of us to keep each other’s secrets, to hold each other’s hands, to keep each other safe.”

Performing a self-managed abortion with drugs could well become the new normal in abortion-banned states like Tennessee. The medications aren’t new; they’ve been available in the U.S. since 2000, so the medical risks are known. But there are now legal risks, which can be higher for someone helping a pregnant woman with this method than for the pregnant woman herself. Medication for first-trimester abortions is now the primary way abortions are induced in the U.S.

The regimen involves two prescription drugs that can be used up through 10 weeks of gestation. Mifepristone is taken first. It’s the abortion drug that’s fairly expensive and highly regulated. A day or two later, the patient takes misoprostol, which is much more widely available and can work on its own to induce an abortion. The drug was developed for treating ulcers in the 1970s but has several other off-label uses aside from abortions, such as alleviating arthritis. It’s even prescribed for animals, so veterinary supply stores carry the medication. Misoprostol is sold over-the-counter in Mexico.

“It’s really based on what somebody can get. And in the self-managed context, the only way to get mifepristone plus misoprostol is through the internet, so it takes time to wait for the delivery,” said Susan Yanow, spokesperson for Women Help Women, a nonprofit that operates across four continents and works to increase access to abortion.

The organization ships both medications all over the world — but not to the U.S. because laws vary so much by state. Social media sites such as Facebook and Instagram have already started pulling down posts offering to send these drugs by mail. Many states that now ban abortion have recently tightened their laws on mail-order abortion drugs.

“We still have the right to share information,” Yanow said. “People use the internet. People use their phones. People will find ways to obtain these pills.”

Women’s needs go beyond finding the medications, which is why Yanow’s organization has a detailed guide on how to use them safely. And she provides training for local reproductive rights groups, as do others.

Lynsey Bourke of Self-Guided Abortion, based in Montana, began producing video tutorials late last year and publishing them on YouTube, explaining how to use misoprostol alone and suggesting ways to make the process more sacred by building an altar, burning incense, and lighting candles. She even provides post-abortion yoga instruction.

With misoprostol alone, multiple doses are needed. Nausea is common. And the medicine induces cramping and bleeding that can be alarming for those who aren’t prepared.

Even some OB-GYNs are quietly supportive of self-managed abortion.

“I’m more worried about people who can’t get to one of these sources and are just so desperate that they take matters into their own hands,” said Dr. Nikki Zite, an OB-GYN at the University of Tennessee Medical Center in Knoxville.

She said clinical counseling before taking the pill combo is ideal. For example, some patients are anemic and could bleed enough to need emergency care. And some just don’t do well with pain and lots of blood.

“Not every patient is a good candidate to miscarry at home,” she said.

But at this point, Zite said, she can’t afford to provide that consultation. In Tennessee, she would be risking a felony and prison time under a six-week ban now in effect, and an all-out abortion ban set to take effect by August. And it’s unclear how far law enforcement is willing to reach.

Tennessee’s laws specifically exempt the pregnant person from prosecution. But a motivated prosecutor could find ways to press charges related to a self-managed abortion, said criminal defense attorney David Raybin in Nashville.

“I mean, that is fraught with peril,” Raybin said. “I would strongly recommend against a woman using such quote-unquote ‘underground methods’ to get medication like that.”

He said it’s best to get a legal abortion in another state. But abortion rights activists in Tennessee said they know travel will be difficult for many. And even for those who can travel, a self-managed abortion may be more convenient. To a degree, reproductive rights groups are willing to help navigate the legal gray area.

Healthy and Free Tennessee, an organization working to promote sexual health and reproductive freedom, has organized several training sessions through Women Help Women in recent weeks. Policy director Nina Gurak said the group’s biggest worry isn’t health complications — it’s the legal risk.

“We recommend that if someone is self-managing an abortion that they have a supporter or friend. That supporter or friend may be at a higher legal risk than the actual person who is self-managing an abortion,” she said. “And then you have to decide for yourself — is that something I’m comfortable with? Is that something I’m not comfortable with?”

Organizations in states with abortion bans have their own risk to assess. They feel confident the First Amendment protects the sharing of medical information endorsed by the World Health Organization.

But abortion rights advocates are torn between raising awareness and becoming a target for anti-abortion lawmakers — who are no longer limited by the constitutional protections Roe v. Wade provided.

“We definitely are concerned about increasing criminalization of abortion or self-managed abortion and abortion pills,” Gurak said. “We also want to balance that with the need for communities to have the information that they need to make the decision for themselves.”

This story is part of a partnership that includes Nashville Public RadioNPR, and KHN.

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.

Some elements may be removed from this article due to republishing restrictions. If you have questions about available photos or other content, please contact NewsWeb@kff.org.