Editorial Addresses Report on FDA Conflict of Interest Screening Efforts
FDA "has distressingly limited interest" in addressing the "rising concern that conflicts of interest may bias the outcome of clinical trials," a New York Times editorial states. The editorial continues that a report released on Monday by the HHS Office of Inspector General on the efforts of FDA officials to identify potential conflicts of interest "found appalling failures" by the officials "to collect information and act on it"FDA accepted most of the recommendations but "complained" that reviewing financial information prior to the start of trials "would increase its workload for no clear gain, especially since many drugs or devices that enter clinical trials never reach the market," the editorial states. According to the Times, "Such bureaucratic excuses seem lame," adding, "Surely it would be better for [FDA] to eliminate potential conflicts before they can bias a trial than try to mitigate them after the results are in." The editorial concludes that FDA's "lax performance underscores the need for Congress to pass legislation requiring all drug and device makers to report their financial arrangements with doctors in a public databank," adding, "That would make it harder for clinical investigators or sponsoring companies to hide potential conflicts, including those that might bias clinical trials for the FDA" (New York Times, 1/13). This is part of the Morning Briefing, a summary of health policy coverage from major news organizations. Sign up for an email subscription.
