Skip to main content

The independent source for health policy research, polling, and news.

Subscribe Follow Us Donate
  • Trump 2.0

    Trump 2.0

    • Agency Watch
    • State Watch
    • Rural Health Payout
  • Public Health

    Public Health

    • Vaccines
    • CDC & Disease
    • Environmental Health
  • Audio Reports

    Audio Reports

    • What the Health?
    • Health Care Helpline
    • KFF Health News Minute
    • An Arm and a Leg
    • Health Hub
    • HealthQ
    • Silence in Sikeston
    • Epidemic
    • See All Audio
  • Special Reports

    Special Reports

    • Bill Of The Month
    • The Body Shops
    • Broken Rehab
    • Deadly Denials
    • Priced Out
    • Dead Zone
    • Diagnosis: Debt
    • Overpayment Outrage
    • Opioid Settlement Tracking
    • See All Special Reports
  • More Topics

    More Topics

    • Elections
    • Health Care Costs
    • Insurance
    • Prescription Drugs
    • Health Industry
    • Immigration
    • Reproductive Health
    • Technology
    • Rural Health
    • Race and Health
    • Aging
    • Mental Health
    • Affordable Care Act
    • Medicare
    • Medicaid
    • Children’s Health

  • Surgeon General
  • Cigna’s ACA Exit
  • Visa Program
  • Medicaid Work Requirements
  • Gavin Newsom

TRENDING TOPICS:

  • Surgeon General
  • Cigna's ACA Exit
  • Visa Program
  • Medicaid Work Requirements
  • Gavin Newsom

Morning Briefing

Summaries of health policy coverage from major news organizations

  • Email

Wednesday, Sep 30 2020

Full Issue

FDA's Approval Process of Opioids Faulted

Clinical trials were too short, patient groups too narrow and safety was rarely assessed, says a new study of the agency's opioid approval process.

Stat: For Two Decades, The FDA Approval Process For Opioids Had Numerous Shortcomings, Study Finds

Over more than two decades, the Food and Drug Administration approved opioid painkillers based on relatively brief pivotal clinical trials that relied on narrowly defined patient groups and rarely assessed key safety outcomes, according to a new study. Specifically, the study found that, for opioids approved between 1997 and 2018 as treatments for chronic pain, none of the trials lasted longer than three months. Moreover, the trials often excluded patients who could not tolerate the painkillers and generally failed to systematically evaluate such known risks as tolerance, drug diversion and so-called non-medical uses. (Silverman, 9/29)

Becker's Hospital Review: FDA Opioid Approvals Relied On Short Trials, Patient Exclusions, Study Contends

None of the clinical trials for opioids the FDA approved to treat chronic pain from 1997 to 2018 lasted longer than three months, according to research published Sept. 29 in Annals of Internal Medicine. Researchers discovered that only 21 of the 39 opioids approved by the FDA from 1997 to 2018 were supported by at least one pivotal trial. The median length of the trials conducted for opioids during this time was 84 days. (Adams, 9/29)

In other news on the opioid crisis —

The New York Times: Coronavirus Pandemic Drives Hike In Opioid Deaths 

On the first Friday in June, Jefrey Cameron, 29, left his home around midnight to buy heroin. He had been struggling with addiction for seven years but had seemingly turned a corner, holding down a job that he loved at Basil’s Pizzeria, driving his teenage sister to the mall to go shopping and sharing a home with his grandmother. But then the coronavirus pandemic hit. When he returned home that night and tried the product, it was so potent that he fell and hit his head in the bathroom. Mr. Cameron texted a friend soon after, saying that he had messed up and would go to a 12-step meeting with a friend that weekend. (Swift and Goodnough, 9/29)

Stat: An FDA Safety Program Is Failing To Stem The Opioid Crisis, Report Finds

A mandated safety program regulators rely on to minimize opioid abuse and misuse is not “well suited” to quickly address the ongoing crisis across the U.S. And the shortcomings reflect a lack of cooperation from opioid makers that made it difficult for the Food and Drug Administration to assess key data, according to a new federal government report. At issue are REMS, or risk evaluation and mitigation strategy programs, which the FDA requires companies to develop when the agency approves a new medicine that may pose a safety risk. When the FDA decides a REMS program is necessary, drug makers must devise a program to provide physician and patient education, sometimes monitor distribution, and send the agency regular assessments. (Silverman, 9/29)

This is part of the Morning Briefing, a summary of health policy coverage from major news organizations. Sign up for an email subscription.
Newsletter icon

Sign Up For Our Newsletter

Stay informed by signing up for the Morning Briefing and other emails:

Recent Morning Briefings

  • Friday, May 1
  • Thursday, April 30
  • Wednesday, April 29
  • Tuesday, April 28
  • Monday, April 27
  • Friday, April 24
More Morning Briefings
RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
  • Special Reports
  • Morning Briefing
  • About Us
  • Donate
  • Staff
  • Republish Our Content
  • Contact Us

Follow Us

  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Bluesky
  • TikTok
  • RSS

Sign up for emails

Join our email list for regular updates based on your personal preferences.

Sign up
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy

© 2026 KFF