Skip to main content

The independent source for health policy research, polling, and news.

Subscribe Follow Us Donate
  • Trump 2.0

    Trump 2.0

    • Agency Watch
    • State Watch
    • Rural Health Payout
  • Public Health

    Public Health

    • Vaccines
    • CDC & Disease
    • Environmental Health
  • Audio Reports

    Audio Reports

    • What the Health?
    • Health Care Helpline
    • KFF Health News Minute
    • An Arm and a Leg
    • Health Hub
    • HealthQ
    • Silence in Sikeston
    • Epidemic
    • See All Audio
  • Special Reports

    Special Reports

    • Bill Of The Month
    • The Body Shops
    • Broken Rehab
    • Deadly Denials
    • Priced Out
    • Dead Zone
    • Diagnosis: Debt
    • Overpayment Outrage
    • Opioid Settlement Tracking
    • See All Special Reports
  • More Topics

    More Topics

    • Elections
    • Health Care Costs
    • Insurance
    • Prescription Drugs
    • Health Industry
    • Immigration
    • Reproductive Health
    • Technology
    • Rural Health
    • Race and Health
    • Aging
    • Mental Health
    • Affordable Care Act
    • Medicare
    • Medicaid
    • Children’s Health

  • Medicaid Work Requirements
  • ‘Skinny Labeling’
  • Gun Control
  • Suicide Prevention
  • Rural Health Payout

TRENDING TOPICS:

  • Medicaid Work Requirements
  • 'Skinny Labeling'
  • Gun Control
  • Suicide Prevention
  • Rural Health Payout

Morning Briefing

Summaries of health policy coverage from major news organizations

  • Email

Friday, May 18 2018

Full Issue

NIH Suspends Enrollment In Drinking Study As Director Worries That Potential Ethical Breach Is 'Tip Of A Larger Iceberg'

The controversy stems from reports that NIH officials met with players in the alcohol industry to woo them to fund the study, which supports the health benefits of moderate drinking.

The New York Times: N.I.H. Halts Enrollment In A Study Of Drinking Now Under Scrutiny

The National Institutes of Health has suspended enrollment in a huge clinical trial on the health benefits of moderate drinking while officials review whether its employees inappropriately solicited funding from the alcohol industry. Five liquor and beer companies are providing about $67 million of the $100 million cost of the 10-year study. In March, The New York Times reported that scientists and officials with the N.I.H.’s National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism met with alcohol industry groups on several occasions in 2013 and 2014 to discuss funding. (Rabin, 5/17)

The Washington Post: NIH Halts $100 Million Study Of Moderate Drinking That Is Funded By Alcohol Industry

Thursday morning’s announcement by NIH Director Francis Collins reflects the seriousness of allegations that surfaced in news reports in recent months, including a story in March in the New York Times that described two scientists and a federal health official pitching the idea for the study to liquor company executives at a 2014 gathering in Palm Beach, Fla. The alcohol industry agreed to fund the research via a private foundation that supports NIH. The goal of the study, which involves 7,000 individuals, is to assess whether moderate drinking — a single drink a day — has a health benefit. Some research has suggested such a benefit, but the conclusion remains controversial, and the U.S. dietary guidelines recommend that people who do not drink alcohol should not start. (Achenbach, 5/17)

Stat: NIH Halts Enrollment In Drinking Study After Concerns Over Conflicts

“For NIH, our reputation is so critical,” Collins said. “And if we are putting ourselves in a circumstance where that could be called into question, I felt like we had to look at that very seriously and come up with another strategy.” (Joseph, 5/17)

CQ HealthBeat: NIH Halts Enrollment In Controversial Alcohol Study

Collins told Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., that he was concerned this study “might be the tip of a larger iceberg.” He has convened a working group to look more closely at the situation. “We will look closely to see if there are other examples of this sort because that would be very much against the principles that we stand for, which is separation of funding sources from outside with decisions about science,” he said. (McIntire, 5/17)

This is part of the Morning Briefing, a summary of health policy coverage from major news organizations. Sign up for an email subscription.
Newsletter icon

Sign Up For Our Newsletter

Stay informed by signing up for the Morning Briefing and other emails:

Recent Morning Briefings

  • Thursday, April 30
  • Wednesday, April 29
  • Tuesday, April 28
  • Monday, April 27
  • Friday, April 24
  • Thursday, April 23
More Morning Briefings
RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
  • Special Reports
  • Morning Briefing
  • About Us
  • Donate
  • Staff
  • Republish Our Content
  • Contact Us

Follow Us

  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Bluesky
  • TikTok
  • RSS

Sign up for emails

Join our email list for regular updates based on your personal preferences.

Sign up
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy

© 2026 KFF