Skip to main content

The independent source for health policy research, polling, and news.

Subscribe Follow Us Donate
  • Trump 2.0

    Trump 2.0

    • Agency Watch
    • State Watch
    • Rural Health Payout
  • Public Health

    Public Health

    • Vaccines
    • CDC & Disease
    • Environmental Health
    All Public Health
  • Audio Reports

    Audio Reports

    • What the Health?
    • Health Care Helpline
    • KFF Health News Minute
    • An Arm and a Leg
    • Health Hub
    • HealthQ
    • Silence in Sikeston
    • Epidemic
    All Audio
  • Special Reports

    Special Reports

    • Bill Of The Month
    • The Body Shops
    • Broken Rehab
    • Deadly Denials
    • Priced Out
    • Dead Zone
    • Diagnosis: Debt
    • Overpayment Outrage
    • Opioid Settlement Tracking
    All Special Reports
  • More Topics

    More Topics

    • Elections
    • Health Care Costs
    • Insurance
    • Prescription Drugs
    • Health Industry
    • Immigration
    • Reproductive Health
    • Technology
    • Rural Health
    • Race and Health
    • Aging
    • Mental Health
    • Affordable Care Act
    • Medicare
    • Medicaid
    • Children’s Health

  • Medicaid Data for Deportation
  • Home Births
  • Hantavirus News Roundup
  • RFK Jr.
  • AI in Healthcare

WHAT'S NEW

  • Medicaid Data for Deportation
  • Home Births
  • Hantavirus News Roundup
  • RFK Jr.
  • AI in Healthcare

Morning Briefing

Summaries of health policy coverage from major news organizations

  • Email

Thursday, Dec 21 2023

Full Issue

Viewpoints: Once Ozempic Is Started, Can It Ever Be Stopped?; Tackling The Weight-Loss Drug Misinformation

Editorial writers discuss obesity drugs, health care and medical ethics.

The New York Times: We Know How To Put People On Ozempic. Do We Know How To Get Them Off It? 

Even without enough knowledge about the ramifications of long-term use, it seems people may have to stay on semaglutide drugs indefinitely to keep weight off and their blood sugar regulated. There are potentially serious side effects to being on the drug for even brief periods, and there are side effects to coming off it. In July, Aria Bendix reported for NBC News that “Ozempic has been on the market for less than six years, and Wegovy for two, so doctors and patients are learning in real time what it’s like to use the drugs for extended periods.” (Jessica Grose, 12/20)

Bloomberg: Ozempic, Wegovy Drove Hype-Filled Debate About Obesity Drugs In 2023

This year, the incredible potential of obesity medicines like Novo Nordisk’s Ozempic and Wegovy and Eli Lilly’s Zepbound started to come into view. The drugs work so well for so many that it’s starting to look like they could change the literal and metaphorical shape of society — starting with our waistlines and extending to our overall health and our habits around food and alcohol. (Lisa Jarvis, 12/20)

Stat: Why Health Care Costs Have Stayed Mostly Flat Since 2010 

All Americans are worried about inflation. The prices for housing, clothes and food at the supermarket are eyepopping and threatening President Biden’s re-election. But there is one totally unexpected exception to inflation recently: health care. (Ezekiel J. Emanuel, 12/21)

The Tennessean: Employers Should Make Sure Health Care Plans Are Inclusive To Transgender Employees

Whether you run a small business, a large company, or a nonprofit organization, you may want to reevaluate the health care plan(s) you provide to your employees if you have not done so since 2020. No, we are not talking about COVID-19, but the United States Supreme Court’s 2020 ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County, 140 S. Ct. 1731 (2020). In 2020, the Supreme Court left little doubt that the protections in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 extend to transgender individuals. (Joycelyn Stevenson and Sarah Belchic, 12/20)

New England Journal of Medicine: Deciding For Patients Who Have Lost Decision-Making Capacity — Finding Common Ground In Medical Ethics 

The 1990 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health riveted the public and sparked discussions about how to make decisions for patients who had lost decision-making capacity. After Cruzan, empirical studies showed that many widely supported approaches to this problem did not work as planned, and ethical analyses showed that many of the key concepts and arguments involved were unsound. (Bernard Lo, 12/21)

New England Journal of Medicine: Fundamentals Of Medical Ethics — A New Perspective Series 

Ethical issues in medicine have been hashed out for centuries, but advances in medical science often give rise to new ethical dilemmas. At the dawn of hemodialysis, for instance, a 1962 Life magazine article thrust medical ethics into public awareness when it described a predominantly lay committee that decided which patients with end-stage renal failure would have access to the new, potentially lifesaving technology — only five slots were available.1 In making these decisions, the committee was guided primarily by their individual consciences because no settled guidelines existed. (Bernard Lo, M.D., Debra Malina, Ph.D., Genevra Pittman, M.P.H., and Stephen Morrissey, Ph.D., 12/21)

This is part of the Morning Briefing, a summary of health policy coverage from major news organizations. Sign up for an email subscription.
Newsletter icon

Sign Up For Our Newsletter

Stay informed by signing up for the Morning Briefing and other emails:

Recent Morning Briefings

  • Today, May 14
  • Wednesday, May 13
  • Tuesday, May 12
  • Monday, May 11
  • Friday, May 8
  • Thursday, May 7
More Morning Briefings
RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
  • Special Reports
  • Morning Briefing
  • About Us
  • Donate
  • Staff
  • Republish Our Content
  • Contact Us

Follow Us

  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Bluesky
  • TikTok
  • RSS

Sign up for emails

Join our email list for regular updates based on your personal preferences.

Sign up
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy

© 2026 KFF