- KFF Health News Original Stories 3
- Hundreds Of Hospitals Struggle To Improve Patient Satisfaction
- The Boss May Be Able To Force You To Buy Company Insurance
- Mental Health Privacy Questions Arise In Rape Case At University Of Oregon
- Political Cartoon: ‘Side Effects Accrued?’
- Health Law 5
- CBO Again Lowers Health Law's Cost Estimates
- Obamacare Enrollment Tally Climbs To 11.7 Million
- Fla. Senate Panel To Consider Controversial Medicaid Expansion Plan
- Supreme Court Orders New Look At Notre Dame's Contraceptive Challenge
- Study Finds Many Marketplace Plans Don't Meet Mental Health Parity Rules
- Capitol Watch 2
- New GOP Push: Restore OTC Drugs As Eligible For Health Savings Accounts
- Sebelius Spoke With Feds Regarding Menendez Investigation
From KFF Health News - Latest Stories:
KFF Health News Original Stories
Hundreds Of Hospitals Struggle To Improve Patient Satisfaction
Pleasing patients has become more important to hospitals as Medicare takes consumers views into account when setting payments. Most hospitals are getting better, but others have not improved since the government started publishing ratings six years ago. (Jordan Rau, 3/10)
The Boss May Be Able To Force You To Buy Company Insurance
Employment experts say firms can require workers to take the coverage that is offered. (Michelle Andrews, 3/10)
Mental Health Privacy Questions Arise In Rape Case At University Of Oregon
In a lawsuit over a rape case involving three basketball players, the university accessed a student’s mental health records detailing treatment she received at the campus clinic. (Kristian Foden-Vencil, Oregon Public Broadcasting, 3/9)
Political Cartoon: ‘Side Effects Accrued?’
KFF Health News provides a fresh take on health policy developments with "Political Cartoon: ‘Side Effects Accrued?’" by John Hambrock.
Here's today's health policy haiku:
If you have a health policy haiku to share, please Contact Us and let us know if we can include your name. Haikus follow the format of 5-7-5 syllables. We give extra brownie points if you link back to an original story.
Opinions expressed in haikus and cartoons are solely the author's and do not reflect the opinions of KFF Health News or KFF.
Summaries Of The News:
CBO Again Lowers Health Law's Cost Estimates
In its latest projection, the Congressional Budget Office sharply drops its estimates of what the health law will cost for the 2015-19 period.
The New York Times:
Budget Office Again Reduces Its Estimate On Cost Of The Affordable Care Act
The Congressional Budget Office on Monday again lowered its estimate of the cost of the Affordable Care Act, citing slow growth of health insurance premiums as a major factor. Just since January, the budget office said, it has reduced its estimate of the 10-year cost of federal insurance subsidies by 20 percent, and its estimate of new Medicaid costs attributable to the law has come down by 8 percent. (Pear, 3/9)
The Wall Street Journal:
Health Law To Cost Less Than Forecast Earlier
Nearly five years after President Barack Obama signed the Affordable Care Act into law, federal budget scorekeepers have sharply revised down the projected costs of the bill. In the latest projection, published by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office on Monday, the major insurance provisions of the law will cost the government 11% less than they forecast six weeks ago, reducing the taxpayer tab by $142 billion over the coming decade. (Timiraos, 3/9)
The Washington Post:
Health-Care Law Will Cost Taxpayers Less Than Expected, CBO Says
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office attributed the savings to spending on medical care in coming years that will not be as great as previously forecast. As a result, the agency said, insurers are not expected to charge Americans as much for coverage, and the government will save on subsidies for low- and moderate-income people. What’s more, the CBO has concluded that companies are not canceling health insurance policies as often as had been anticipated earlier this year. Fewer Americans consequently are planning to sign up for insurance under the Affordable Care Act, generating more taxpayer savings. (Ehrenfreund and Somashekhar, 3/9)
The Associated Press:
CBO: Slowing Costs Reduce Price Of Health Care Overhaul
Slowing health care costs are driving down the price tag of President Barack Obama's health overhaul, just as the Supreme Court is weighing whether to strike a key part of the law. Estimates released Monday reduce the projected cost to taxpayers by $142 billion over the next decade. That's an 11 percent drop from previous estimates. (Ohlemacher, 3/9)
Los Angeles Times:
Q&A: Why Affordable Care Act Costs Continue To Fall
As the Supreme Court considers the fate of government subsidies to millions of consumers receiving coverage under the Affordable Care Act, a nonpartisan budget analysis found Monday that projected costs of President Obama's signature healthcare program continued to fall. Just in time for Washington's annual fight over government spending, the Congressional Budget Office issued its revised outlook for the projected costs of implementing the act. As it has previously, the budget office found that the program is proving to be less expensive than previously expected. Here's a look at some of its latest findings. (Mascaro, 3/9)
CNN Money:
Obamacare Will Cost Less Than Thought
The president's landmark health reform law will cost $506 billion for the coming five fiscal years, according to updated projections from the Congressional Budget Office, released Monday. That's 29% less than the agency's projection back in March 2010. (Luhby, 3/9)
The Fiscal Times:
CBO Rolls Back Obamacare’s Price Tag
Washington budgeteers have some good news for Obamacare and its impact on the federal deficit. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office along with the Joint Committee on Taxation have revised the cost of the Affordable Care Act down to $1.21 trillion over the next decade. That’s an 11 percent reduction, or roughly $143 billion less than the $1.34 trillion the agency had projected in January. (Ehley, 3/9)
Modern Healthcare:
Estimated ACA Costs Fall Again, Even As Expected 'Cadillac' Tax Revenue Dwindles
Spending on the insurance coverage provisions of the Affordable Care Act is projected to be $142 billion lower than the figure arrived at six weeks ago, according to the Congressional Budget Office. That's primarily due to reduced enrollment projected for exchange plans and Medicaid, as well as lower than anticipated premium costs. But while spending on exchange subsidies is expected to be much lower, so, too, is revenue from the ACA's controversial excise tax on health plans with generous benefits, the CBO said. (Demko and Herman, 3/9)
Politico Pro:
CBO Cuts Obamacare Cost, Enrollment Estimates
Obamacare’s insurance provisions will cost about 11 percent less than anticipated and cover fewer people than was estimated just months ago, the Congressional Budget Office reported on Monday. (Faler, 3/9)
Obamacare Enrollment Tally Climbs To 11.7 Million
On Monday, Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Burwell Mathews announced this total, which reflects sign-ups on the state and federal insurance exchanges through Feb. 22. The overall count is likely to increase more because of extended enrollment periods through April that were created for people who learn about the penalties for not having insurance when they file their taxes.
The Wall Street Journal:
Affordable Care Act Enrollment Near 11.7 Million
Nearly 11.7 million people signed up for health coverage in state and federal marketplaces under the Affordable Care Act, the Obama administration said Monday. The latest numbers on the second year of open enrollment are a tangible sign the health law is effective, Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Mathews Burwell said Monday during a White House event to thank stakeholders who helped during the sign-up period. (Armour, 3/9)
USA Today:
State, Federal Health Exchange Enrollment Nears 11.7M
Nearly 11.7 million people were enrolled in an Obamacare plan through Feb. 22, Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Burwell said Monday. That number will continue to increase because of extended enrollment periods through April for those who learn of the penalties for not having health care while they are doing their taxes. But as of now, Burwell said more than half of those who signed up were new customers. (O'Donnell, 3/9)
News outlets also report state-specific enrollment numbers -
Los Angeles Times:
Obamacare: Agents Signed Up 43% Of New California Enrollment
California fell short of its second-year enrollment goal for Obamacare, but don't blame insurance agents. They accounted for 43% of new enrollment in Covered California, the state's health insurance exchange. That compares with 30% of people who enrolled themselves online or 10% who turned to a certified enrollment counselor or navigator. (Terhune, 3/9)
The Baltimore Sun:
More Than 289,000 Buy Health Plans On Exchange
The Maryland Health Exchange reported Monday that 289,131 people enrolled in private and government-funded plans during open enrollment that ended Feb. 28. The exchange, where under the Affordable Care Act people who don't receive insurance through an employer can get a health plan, enrolled 122,778 people in private plans and 166,353 in Medicaid. (McDaniels, 3/9)
Fla. Senate Panel To Consider Controversial Medicaid Expansion Plan
Elsewhere, an Alaskan GOP lawmaker previews a Medicaid reform proposal that does not include a provision to expand the program through the federal health law while Democrats in Montana blast a committee's action last week to kill the governor's expansion plan. News outlets in Utah, Pennsylvania, Colorado and Oregon also offer related updates.
Tampa Bay Times:
Florida Senate To Consider Medicaid Expansion Proposal
A Senate committee will consider a controversial plan Tuesday that would extend federally subsidized health insurance to more than 800,000 poor Floridians — but require a waiver from the federal government to pay for it. The proposal (SPB 7044) would establish a state-run private insurance exchange available to Florida residents who earn less than $16,000 in annual income, or $33,000 for a family of four. Beneficiaries would be required to work or attend school, and pay monthly premiums. (McGrory, 3/9)
Alaska Public Radio:
Senate Republicans Preview Medicaid Reform Bill
Senator Pete Kelly, a Fairbanks Republican, previewed a bill he is planning to introduce this week to reform the current Medicaid system. He said the bill won’t include a provision to expand Medicaid, he said during a press conference this morning. A group of Anchorage religious leaders and lay people are in Juneau to try to convince him and other skeptical lawmakers to change their minds on the issue. (Feidt, 3/9)
Helena Independent Record:
Dems Rip Republicans For Stuffing Medicaid-Expansion Bill Last Week, But Don’T Try To Revive It
Legislative Democrats Monday blasted Republicans for killing Gov. Steve Bullock’s Medicaid-expansion proposal in committee last Friday night, saying procedural rules were violated -- but stopped short of trying to overturn the action on the House floor. House Minority Leader Chuck Hunter, D-Helena, rose on the floor to object to a committee report killing the Medicaid-expansion bill, saying Republicans on the House Human Services Committee improperly voted before Democrats could debate or amend the bill. (Dennison, 3/9)
Helena Independent Record:
GOP: Medicaid Expansion Will Cost State More Than $100M Per Biennium After 2020
Supporters of Medicaid expansion in Montana aren’t being honest about its long-term cost to the state, which is more than $50 million a year by 2021, a Republican state senator says. “It’s dishonest to the public … to portray that Medicaid expansion will save the state money,” said Sen. Fred Thomas, R-Stevensville. Thomas, who has been working on GOP alternatives to Democratic Gov. Steve Bullock’s proposal to expand Medicaid, said accepting federal money now for a full expansion to cover up to 70,000 low-income Montanans will mean growing additional costs for the state in the long term. (Dennison, 3/9)
Salt Lake Tribune:
Senate, House Still Hoping For Compromise On Medicaid Expansion
Capitol Hill leaders are talking compromise on health care. Lawmakers said Monday they're hopeful, even as the clock winds down on the 2015 legislative session, that the Senate and governor can strike a compromise with the House over Medicaid expansion. House Majority Leader Jim Dunnigan, R-Taylorsville, said he wants to reach "common ground" with the Senate. "The time frame is dwindling," he said. "But there is still time." (Moulton, 3/9)
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette:
Transition From Healthy PA To Medicaid To Start Sept. 1
The thousands of Pennsylvanians who are now receiving subsidized health coverage though former Gov. Tom Corbett’s “Healthy PA” program will be transferred to the state’s traditional Medicaid plan by Sept. 1, according to the state Department of Human Services. There will be no gaps in coverage during the shift, the department said. (Toland, 3/10)
The Denver Post:
Colorado Health Insurance Exchange Officials Clash Over Medicaid Role
Medicaid patients enrolling through the state health insurance exchange are taking too much of its resources, exchange board members said Monday, but state officials propose an even tighter partnership. The federal policy of "no wrong door" was meant to be a single online portal for the uninsured that would seamlessly determine their eligibility for either Medicaid or private insurance with tax subsidies they purchased on the exchange. (Draper, 3/9)
Health News Colorado:
Exchange Board Orders Audit While Governor Launches Talks Between Exchange, Medicaid Managers
Millions in new cost overruns and escalating finger-pointing between Colorado’s Medicaid bosses and health exchange managers spurred the exchange board on Monday to vote for its own “end-to-end” audit, while the governor’s office is launching a new round of talks between top officials. (Kerwin McCrimmon, 3/9)
The Oregonian:
Cover Oregon Director Aaron Patnode Won't Be Hired By State As Health Exchange Dissolves
As Cover Oregon goes away under a bill signed last week, so will the job of Aaron Patnode, the executive director hired last summer to put the health insurance exchange's troubles behind it. (Budnick, 3/9)
Supreme Court Orders New Look At Notre Dame's Contraceptive Challenge
The justices asked the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reconsider its decision against the Roman Catholic university in light of the June 2014 Supreme Court ruling allowing certain privately owned corporations to seek exemptions from the health law's mandate that female employees have access to contraceptives free of charge. A Baltimore-area order of nuns found hope in the ruling.
Los Angeles Times:
Supreme Court Revives Notre Dame's Challenge To Contraceptive Policy
The Supreme Court has revived the University of Notre Dame's effort to shield itself from an Obama administration policy to ensure all female employees are provided a full range of contraceptives, including those who work for religious schools and colleges. The administration says Catholic colleges need not provide or pay for the disputed contraceptives themselves, but they must at least notify their insurer or the government so the coverage can be provided separately. (Savage, 3/9)
The Associated Press:
Justices Order New Look At Notre Dame Birth Control Case
Notre Dame is among dozens of religious organizations that have challenged a compromise in the Affordable Care Act offered by the Obama administration to faith-based groups. The compromise attempts to create a buffer for faith-based groups that oppose birth control, while ensuring that women still can obtain contraceptives free of charge. The federal appeals court in Chicago ruled against Notre Dame, but that occurred before the Supreme Court decided the Hobby Lobby case in favor of corporations with similar objections. (3/9)
Reuters:
Supreme Court Revives Notre Dame's Obamacare Contraception Objections
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday revived the University of Notre Dame's religious objections to the requirement for contraception coverage under President Barack Obama's healthcare law, throwing out a lower court decision in favor of the federal government. The justices asked the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reconsider its decision against the South Bend, Indiana-based Roman Catholic university in light of the June 2014 Supreme Court ruling that allowed certain privately owned corporations to seek exemptions from the provision. (Hurley, 3/9)
The Baltimore Sun:
Supreme Court Decision Brings Hope To Little Sisters Of The Poor In Birth Control Case
A local order of nuns that has sued the federal government over a contraception coverage requirement under Obamacare found hope in a ruling Monday by the U.S. Supreme Court, which backed the University of Notre Dame in a similar action. The Little Sisters of the Poor, an international order of Catholic nuns with U.S. headquarters in Catonsville, is one of hundreds of groups fighting the requirement on religious grounds. (Savage and Knezevich, 3/9)
The Hill:
SCOTUS Tosses Lower Ruling On Birth Control Mandate
The Supreme Court on Monday tossed out a lower court’s ruling that required the University of Notre Dame to cover all forms of birth control for its employees under ObamaCare. The ruling from the Supreme Court gives new life to an appeal from Notre Dame, which has sought an exemption from ObamaCare’s contraception mandate because of its religious ties. (Ferris, 3/9)
Study Finds Many Marketplace Plans Don't Meet Mental Health Parity Rules
The researchers found that about a quarter of plans had online information suggesting they don't follow health law provisions to treat mental and physical conditions similarly. Also in health law news, an analysis suggests how states could switch to a local marketplace to avoid fallout from a possible Supreme Court decision striking subsidies on the federal exchange and Jeb Bush talks about his view of the health overhaul.
USA Today:
Mental Health Coverage Unequal In Many Obamacare Plans
Insurance coverage for mental and physical illness remains unequal despite promises that Obamacare would help level the playing field, mental health advocates and researchers say. A new study by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health found that consumer information on a quarter of the Obamacare plans that researchers examined appeared to go against a federal "parity" law designed to stop discrimination in coverage for people with mental health or addiction problems. (Ungar and O'Donnell, 3/9)
Stateline:
Q&A: Could States With Federal Exchanges Easily Launch Their Own?
The Obama administration says it does not have a contingency plan if the U.S. Supreme Court rules against federal tax subsidies in King v. Burwell. But lawmakers in at least nine states are proposing backstop measures that legal experts say could work. (Vestal, 3/10)
Politico:
Jeb Bush Talks Alternative To Obamacare 'Monstrosity'
Jeb Bush says that Obamacare is a “monstrosity” and wants the government to focus instead on a catastrophic coverage plan to help people who experience costly medical crises. The potential Republican 2016 presidential contender said that he doesn’t see Obamacare being repealed before President Barack Obama leaves office. But once it is, he wants to see a different plan. (Haberkorn, 3/9)
Politico Pro:
Small Group Market Expansion: The Next ACA Delay?
HHS is considering yet another Obamacare delay, this time of the law’s 2016 expansion of the small group market. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the insurers’ trade association, among others, have asked HHS Secretary Sylvia Mathews Burwell for a two-year delay in broadening that market to businesses with up to 99 employees. It currently includes employers with fewer than 50 workers. (Norman, 3/9)
New GOP Push: Restore OTC Drugs As Eligible For Health Savings Accounts
Meanwhile, a bipartisan bill in the Senate to legalize medical marijuana under federal law is slated for introduction Tuesday. In addition, congressional physicians are seeking accommodations for doctors during the transition to ICD-10 coding and the governor of Oklahoma endorses efforts by some congressional Republicans to soften the impact if the Supreme Court overturns some of the health law's insurance subsidies.
CQ Healthbeat:
New GOP Health Law Target: OTC Drugs And Health Savings Accounts
Rep. Lynn Jenkins is pushing a bipartisan $5 billion change to the health care law that would restore over-the-counter drugs as eligible expenses for health savings accounts. Jenkins, vice chairman of the Republican Conference, predicted broad bipartisan support for her new proposal (HR 1270), co-sponsored by Democrat Ron Kind of Wisconsin. (Ota, 3/9)
Politico:
Paul, Booker, Gillibrand To Introduce Medical Marijuana Bill
Sens. Rand Paul, Cory Booker and Kirsten Gillibrand will introduce on Tuesday a Senate bill that would legalize medical marijuana under federal law, another possible step towards relaxation of once strict policies toward the drug. (Everett, 3/9)
CQ Healthbeat:
Doctors In Congress Ask For Accommodations On Billing Code Deadline
With the medical billing system in the United States on track for a major conversion, physician-lawmakers in Congress are calling for help for doctors whose cash flows may be disrupted during this transition to the ICD-10 codes. There's a drive underway to have the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services offer some accommodations for doctors as an Oct. 1 deadline for the code switchover nears. (Young, 2/9)
The Hill:
GOP Governor Endorses Idea To Extend Obamacare Plans
Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin (R) on Monday endorsed an idea put forward by some congressional Republicans to help soften the impact of a Supreme Court ruling against part of Obamacare. (Sullivan, 3/9)
Sebelius Spoke With Feds Regarding Menendez Investigation
Politico reports that former Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius spoke with federal authorities regarding a private meeting with Sen. Bob Menendez, a New Jersey Democrat who is at the center of a criminal probe related to the Medicare billing practices of a close friend and benefactor. The Associated Press notes the case will pose a major challenge for the Justice Department's anti-corruption unit.
Politico:
Robert Menendez Case: Kathleen Sebelius Also Questioned By Feds
Former Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius offered new details about a private meeting with Sen. Bob Menendez at the center of a criminal probe into the senator’s actions — and revealed for the first time she spoke with federal authorities about the matter. In an interview with POLITICO on Monday, Sebelius said that she disputed the New Jersey Democrat’s assertions three years ago that the federal government had uneven billing practices that unfairly hurt a company owned by Salomon Melgen, a close friend and political benefactor of the senator. (Raju, 3/10)
The Associated Press:
Menendez Case Would Test Justice Dept. Anti-Corruption Unit
A criminal prosecution of Sen. Bob Menendez would represent a major test for a Justice Department anti-corruption unit that recently scored the conviction of a former Virginia governor, but endured humbling setbacks in cases against two former U.S. senators. The New Jersey Democrat is expected to face criminal charges in the coming weeks over his ties to a Florida eye doctor who is also a longtime friend and political donor, a person familiar with the matter told The Associated Press. Menendez denied wrongdoing and said he has served honorably in his more than 20 years in Congress. (3/9)
Hospitals Struggle To Improve Patient Satisfaction Scores
The federal government considers patient survey results when setting hospital pay levels. Also in the news, Reuters reports that letting patients see their medical records might ease their confusion and worry.
Kaiser Health News:
Hundreds Of Hospitals Struggle To Improve Patient Satisfaction
In April, the government will begin boiling down the patient feedback into a five-star rating for hospitals. Federal officials say they hope that will make it easier for consumers to digest the information now available on Medicare’s Hospital Compare website. Hospitals say judging them on a one-to-five scale is too simplistic. Nationally, the hospital industry has improved in all the areas the surveys track, including clean and quiet their rooms are and how well doctors and nurses communicate. But hundreds of hospitals have not made headway in boosting their ratings, federal records show. (Rau, 3/10)
Reuters:
Seeing Medical Records Might Ease Patients' Confusion
Letting patients see their medical records while they’re in the hospital might ease worry and confusion without extra work for doctors and nurses, a small study suggests. (Rapaport, 3/9)
And on the topic of drug costs -
The Wall Street Journal:
Expensive Hepatitis C Medications Drive Prescription-Drug Spending
Prescription-drug spending rose more than 12% last year in the U.S., the biggest annual increase in over a decade, according to a report by the nation’s largest pharmacy benefit manager. The increase was driven in large part by soaring demand for expensive new hepatitis C treatments and price increases for diabetes and cancer drugs. (Walker, 3/10)
Advocates Complain Of Continued Poor-Quality VA Care
While waiting times have dropped in many facilities, some vets and their advocates contend quicker visits are masking deeper problems of understaffing, inexperienced doctors and poor care quality. The Seattle Times tells the story of one man who lost his leg after multiple surgeries over several years.
The Seattle Times:
Vet Loses Faith In VA After Surgeries, Amputation
When Tim Kuncl shattered his shinbone after falling from his Puyallup home’s rooftop while hanging Christmas lights in 2011, he trusted that his local Veterans Affairs hospital would return him to health. But more than three years and three surgeries later, the 45-year-old Coast Guard veteran’s confidence in VA health care has also been smashed. Many veterans agree with local VA officials’ assessment that waiting times for appointments at Puget Sound facilities have dropped. Still, some vets and their advocates contend quicker visits are masking deeper problems of understaffing, inexperienced doctors and poor care quality. (Kamb, 3/9)
Meanwhile, the VA releases an opiate management tool and the skyrocketing price of an antidote to heroin overdoses raises concerns.
The Associated Press:
VA To Release Opiate Safety Management Tool Ahead Of Investigation Results At Tomah Hospital
The Department of Veterans Affairs announced a new computer tool Monday aimed at helping doctors better monitor their patients' use of prescription drugs, as the agency continues investigating claims of narcotic overprescribing and retaliatory behavior at the VA hospital in Tomah. The program, called the opioid therapy risk report, provides information about appropriate dosages for patients experiencing pain symptoms. (Ferguson, 3/9)
The Associated Press:
Heroin Overdose Antidote's Rising Price Prompts Worries
Price hikes are curtailing access to a popular form of an antidote to heroin overdoses, with costs doubling in the past year and the manufacturer's stock price rising by 70 percent since it went public. Advocates fear the higher cost of naloxone, often sold in the U.S. under the brand name Narcan, will ultimately lead to the deaths of addicts who could have been saved if they'd had access to the drug. (Matheson and Welsh-Huggins, 3/9)
A selection of health policy stories from California, Minnesota, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Missouri, Ohio, Indiana, Oregon, New Jersey and Georgia.
The Oregonian:
2 Oregon Bills Promote Health Care Pricing Transparency
Two bills before the Oregon Legislature aim to inform consumers about health care pricing. One bill would require extensive pricing information while the other would provide patients with median prices that would not be insurance-specific. (Terry, 3/9)
The Visalia Times-Delta:
California Farm-Worker Health Care Bill In Pipeline
A state bill would use a little creative financing to provide round-the-clock medical coverage to farm workers in the Salinas Valley and around the state. The bill would establish the Care of Agricultural Workers Fund, a pilot program that would be in place for up to three years and pay for “medical, surgical, and hospital treatment for occupational and nonoccupational injuries and illnesses incurred by agricultural workers.” (Robledo, 3/9)
The Boston Globe:
Partners’ Deal With Doctors Group Under Fire
Just five weeks after its plans to merge with a big suburban hospital were rebuffed, the state’s most powerful health system is moving to complete an acquisition of a smaller doctors group that will strengthen its foothold in the Eastern Massachusetts medical market. (Dayal McCluskey, 3/10)
California Healthline:
One Million Medi-Cal Renewals Up Every Month, Termination Data 'Not Available'
State officials are in the midst of dropping a large number of Medi-Cal beneficiaries. It's the Medi-Cal renewal process -- every year, beneficiaries are required to re-enroll to continue receiving the benefit. (Gorn, 3/9)
The Associated Press:
After Years Of Losses, Rural Nursing Homes Hope For Boost With Funding Change
In tiny towns across Minnesota, nursing homes are stretching limited state funds until it comes time to cut some service or shut down entirely. Lawmakers and industry groups are moving to replace a decades-old funding mechanism for nursing facilities they say falls far short of the actual cost of caring for seniors. It's an emotional issue that combines caring for the elderly with a sharper interest on rural Minnesota, where facilities are losing millions of dollars, and politicians are taking notice. (Potter, 3/9)
The Associated Press:
Indiana Lawmakers Consider 3-year Ban On Building Nursing Homes
The Legislature is reconsidering an effort to impose a moratorium on nursing home construction in most of Indiana, a plan similar to one that failed a year ago following private lobbying by a Republican lawmaker whose family business faced losing millions of dollars. The proposed three-year moratorium would largely prohibit the Indiana Department of Health from giving licenses for new nursing homes, except for counties with occupancy rates greater than 90 percent. It wouldn't prevent construction of about two dozen new facilities that have submitted plans to state agencies or construction of assisted living centers. (Davies, 3/9)
The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette:
Transition From Healthy PA To Medicaid To Start Sept. 1
The thousands of Pennsylvanians who are now receiving subsidized health coverage though former Gov. Tom Corbett’s “Healthy PA” program will be transferred to the state’s traditional Medicaid plan by Sept. 1, according to the state Department of Human Services. There will be no gaps in coverage during the shift, the department said. (Toland, 3/9)
The Baltimore Sun:
Former Ravens Player To Testify Against Right-to-die Bill
Former Ravens linebacker O.J. Brigance plans to urge state lawmakers to vote against right-to-die legislation in Annapolis, lending a prominent voice to one of the most controversial issues facing the General Assembly this year. (Cox, 3/9)
Georgia Health News:
Devil's In The Budget Details For State Workers
The budget issue that has most rattled the General Assembly this year involves the proposed elimination of health insurance for 11,500 part-time school employees, mainly bus drivers and cafeteria workers. Gov. Nathan Deal, defending the insurance cut for these “non-certificate” school workers, argued that it’s a matter of fairness to other state employees who work part time but don’t qualify for benefits. (Miller, 3/9)
The St. Joseph News-Press:
Senior Prison Population Continues To Rise
Missouri's taxpayers have been paying for housing a growing number of older prisoners. According to the department's own studies over a decade, the incarcerated prison population age 50 and older has grown. As a group, regardless of age, incarcerated offenders have a higher risk of having major medical issues from their lifestyle choices, like chronic substance abuse. It's a fact Mr. Lombardi recognizes. (White, 3/9)
The Des Moines Register:
Does Iowa Constitution Protect Abortion Rights?
When Planned Parenthood lawyers go before the Iowa Supreme Court Wednesday, they'll be asking for more than permission to continue using a controversial telemedicine system for dispensing abortion pills. They'll also be asking the justices to declare that the Iowa Constitution protects women's right to abortion. Such a ruling could give Iowa abortion rights proponents a stronger hand in future court battles, an independent legal expert said. (Leys, 3/9)
NPR:
States Fund Pregnancy Centers That Discourage Abortion
Google "abortion Columbus" and halfway down the first page is a headline: "Your Right to Choose, Abortion in Columbus." It's for Pregnancy Decision Health Center, or PDHC, a chain of six sites in Ohio's capital whose aim is actually to guide women out of having the procedure. Like many of the thousands of crisis pregnancy centers across the U.S., the PDHC near Ohio State University is right next door to a Planned Parenthood. There's a cozy room for private chats and a larger open space decorated in soothing colors. (Ludden, 3/9)
Nexstar Broadcasting:
Univ. Of Scranton Proposal To Remove Abortion Coverage Draws Protest
Planned Parenthood Keystone and its supporters organized the rally in opposition to the University of Scranton's President's plan to remove abortion from faculty and staff health insurance coverage, even in cases of incest, rape, or when a woman's life is at risk.
Los Angeles Times:
Parents Take Extreme Steps To Keep Their Kids From The Unvaccinated
A Bay Area mother formed a Facebook page where parents could arrange play dates for their children with other vaccinated youngsters. Another mom advocates socially isolating the unvaccinated by asking parents if their child is inoculated before accepting a birthday invitation, or even using the swings at the playground. And an Eagle Rock mom says she now asks about vaccine records when she buys used baby clothing. The fierce debate over childhood vaccines is prompting some parents to take extreme measures to make sure their children are segregated from the unvaccinated. (Foxhall, 3/9)
Kaiser Health News:
Mental Health Privacy Questions Arise In Rape Case At University Of Oregon
The privacy of students who get care at university clinics is in doubt after the mental health records of a women who says she was raped at the University of Oregon were accessed by the school in the course of defending itself against a lawsuit. The unidentified student is suing the university for mishandling her assault. She says she was raped by three basketball players last year. The University of Oregon found the players responsible, kicked them off the team and out of school. (Foden-Vencil, 3/9)
Minnesota Public Radio:
Ride To The Hospital Now, Pay Later -- And Pay And Pay
When an ambulance responds to a 911 call, crew members will likely ask about symptoms and take the patient's blood pressure. One topic that probably won't come up in the conversation is money. And that might lead to an unpleasant surprise later on. The fees charged by local fire departments and nonprofit hospitals typically run more than $1,000. (Gilbert, 3/9)
NJ Spotlight:
Many Hospitals In New Jersey Would See Deep Cuts In State Funding For Charity Care
Many New Jersey hospitals would see steep declines in the amount they’re paid in direct state subsidies under Gov. Chris Christie’s proposed budget, although some would receive more aid. In releasing hospital-by-hospital aid figures on Friday, state Department of Health officials said the overall proposed 23 percent cut in charity care reimbursements was the result of an even greater decline of 43 percent in the amount of charity care that hospitals provided to uninsured state residents last year. (Kitchenman, 3/9)
Viewpoints: Health Savings Propel Good Deficit News; VA Delays; Medicine, Race And Poverty
A selection of opinions on health care from around the country.
The New York Times' The Upshot:
More Good News On The Deficit, This Time Because Of Private Insurance Health Premiums
Estimates for government health care spending keep coming down. A few months, ago, we wrote about how a slowing trend in Medicare spending had led federal budget forecasters to make drastic reductions in their estimates of the program’s costs. On Monday, they made similar cuts in their forecast of what the federal government will spend on private insurance premiums. (Margot Sanger-Katz, 3/9)
The New York Times' The Upshot:
In Forecasting Health Costs, Let Technology Be Your Guide
The expansion of health care insurance can drive the development of new technologies that can drive up health care spending. But it doesn’t have to. By historical standards, health spending growth has been low since 2002. As the federal and state governments expand health insurance coverage, will this relatively low growth continue? The answer depends in large part on how investments in health care technology are encouraged. (Austin Frakt, 3/9)
Modern Healthcare:
The High Price Of Precision Medicine
Financial markets have sent another signal that the coming era of precision or personalized medicine could wind up making cancer care unaffordable for millions of people. AbbVie announced last week that it will purchase a little-known biotechnology firm called Pharmacyclics for the stunning sum of $21 billion. To put that into perspective, Gilead Sciences in 2011 bought Pharmasset, the maker of Sovaldi, for half that price. Somebody is going to have to pay the return on that $21 billion investment. (Merrill Goozner, 3/7)
The San Antonio Express-News:
VA Reform Needed Without Delay
Do the nearly 1.7 million Texas veterans deserve quality health care? For most of us, this is a no-brainer, but the Department of Veterans Affairs has a harder time answering that question. If the VA is as concerned as the rest of us are with the quality of veterans’ care, why are thousands of veterans in Texas still waiting months to see a doctor? (Cody McGregor, 3/9)
Modern Healthcare:
Are Republicans, Chief Justice Roberts Sweating King Doomsday Scenario?
Even if the U.S. Supreme Court strikes down the healthcare reform law's premium subsidies, Obamacare will live on in many important ways, a recent New York Times article argued. But would it? Given the awful mess such a ruling would create, why wouldn't Congress and the White House instead repeal the entire law and put an end to the hemorrhaging? (Harris Meyer, 3/9)
Los Angeles Times:
No Regrets: Reclaiming Abortion As A Force For Social Good
You’d think from the frenzy of anti-abortion regulations that have swept the country in the last few years that Americans have decided abortion should be outlawed. They have not, although it’s become wildly unfashionable, if not downright revolutionary, to speak of abortion as an unmitigated social good. (Robin Abcarian, 3/9)
The Tennessee Daily Times:
Mental Health Care Funding Cuts Would Be Shortsighted
Gov. Bill Haslam is right to be taking a second look at budget cuts in case management of adults with mental illness. The impetus for the proposed spending limits is a $10.5 million savings in the 2015-2016 budget sent by the administration to the Legislature. (3/9)
Des Moines Register:
Iowa Needs To Get A Handle On Medicaid Costs
The way Iowa provides health care for its neediest citizens is about to change dramatically, and I am concerned it may lead to lower-quality care at a higher cost to Iowa taxpayers. Some 564,000 low-income Iowans are covered by the state Medicaid program, which costs $4.2 billion per year. ... Currently, Iowa runs its own Medicaid program under a “fee-for-service” model for the majority of the Medicaid patients in the state. Gov. Terry Branstad and the director of the Iowa Department of Human Services, Charles Palmer, want to move Iowa Medicaid to a “managed-care” model administered by private companies. (State Rep. John Forbes, 3/9)
JAMA:
The Health Of Young African American Men
Deaths in Ferguson, Missouri; New York City; Sanford, Florida; and other areas have focused international attention on young African American men. In a recent campaign, young African American men draw attention to key overlooked facts that describe their demographic: 1 of 3 goes to college, 3 of 4 are drug free, 5 of 9 have jobs, 7 of 8 are not teenaged fathers, and 11 of 12 finish high school. How can clinicians help address existing health disparities and add to these positive outcomes? (Stephen A. Martin, Kenn Harris and Brian W. Jack, 3/9)
JAMA:
Achieving Health Equity By Design
Disparities in health outcomes by race and ethnicity and by income status are persistent and difficult to reduce. For more than a decade, infant mortality rates have been 2 to 3 times higher among African American populations, rates of potentially preventable hospitalization have been substantially higher among African American and Latino populations, and the complications of diabetes have disproportionately afflicted African American and Latino populations. ... A common explanation for long-standing disparities is the challenge of addressing social determinants of health .... At the same time, the increasing appreciation for social determinants can have the perverse effect of undermining the potential role of public health and health care in promoting health equity. It is tempting, when confronted with substantial disparities, for leaders in health to implicate factors beyond their control. (Winston F. Wong, Thomas A. LaVeist and Joshua M. Sharfstein, 3/9)
JAMA:
Race, Poverty, And Medicine In The United States
I spent most of my career at the Boston City Hospital, now known as Boston Medical Center, that has emphasized “exceptional care without exception.” At Boston City Hospital the 2 worlds of race and poverty collide on an almost daily basis. Under the 4-decade leadership of 2 pediatric chairs, Joel Alpert, MD, and Barry Zuckerman, MD, and continuing under the current chair Robert Vinci, MD, the Department of Pediatrics expanded the boundaries of traditional medicine. In addition to providing care for medical problems such as asthma, HIV/AIDS, seizures, prematurity, and sickle cell disease, the department is committed to addressing issues of poverty, violence, poor housing, and food insecurity. (Howard Bauchner, 3/9)