Skip to main content

The independent source for health policy research, polling, and news.

Subscribe Follow Us Donate
  • Trump 2.0

    Trump 2.0

    • Agency Watch
    • State Watch
    • Rural Health Payout
  • Public Health

    Public Health

    • Vaccines
    • CDC & Disease
    • Environmental Health
    All Public Health
  • Audio Reports

    Audio Reports

    • What the Health?
    • Health Care Helpline
    • KFF Health News Minute
    • An Arm and a Leg
    • Health Hub
    • HealthQ
    • Silence in Sikeston
    • Epidemic
    All Audio
  • Special Reports

    Special Reports

    • Bill Of The Month
    • The Body Shops
    • Broken Rehab
    • Deadly Denials
    • Priced Out
    • Dead Zone
    • Diagnosis: Debt
    • Overpayment Outrage
    • Opioid Settlement Tracking
    • Eleven Minutes
    All Special Reports
  • More Topics

    More Topics

    • Elections
    • Health Care Costs
    • Insurance
    • Prescription Drugs
    • Health Industry
    • Immigration
    • Reproductive Health
    • Technology
    • Rural Health
    • Race and Health
    • Aging
    • Mental Health
    • Affordable Care Act
    • Medicare
    • Medicaid
    • Children’s Health

  • Vaccine Policy in Colorado
  • Family Separation
  • Shakeup at U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
  • Ebola
  • ACA Enrollment

WHAT'S NEW

  • Vaccine Policy in Colorado
  • Family Separation
  • Shakeup at U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
  • Ebola
  • ACA Enrollment

Morning Briefing

Summaries of health policy coverage from major news organizations

  • Email

Wednesday, Apr 13 2022

Full Issue

Perspectives: Doctors' Fear Of Opioids Hurts Patients; What Is The Right Decision On Aduhelm?

Read recent commentaries about drug-cost issues.

Stat: Underprescribing Opioids Can Also Cause Harm 

A reporter recently asked me about what harm I may have caused as a pain management physician who prescribes opioids. As I reflected on my last 10 years in this field, my response was that the harms I may have caused were because I underprescribed these drugs, not overprescribed them. (Antje M. Barreveld, 4/12)

Also —

The Washington Post: Medicare Coverage For Costly, But Controversial, New Alzheimers Drug Will Go Only To People Enrolled In Approved Clinical Trials 

The federal government on Thursday affirmed its plan to limit coverage for a costly new medication for Alzheimer’s disease, restricting it to Medicare patients enrolled in clinical trials. Despite the Food and Drug Administration’s accelerated approval of the drug, Aduhelm, last June, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said it would limit payments for the drug to people in carefully controlled tests of the medication’s effectiveness for the progressive neurological disease. (Lenny Bernstein and Rachel Roubein, 4/7)

Bloomberg: Medicare Is Cleaning Up The FDA’s Mess On Biogen’s Alzheimer’s Drug 

edicare has decided once and for all not to pay for Biogen’s new Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm unless patients are enrolled in a clinical study. The agency’s final call was unsurprising, but blessedly rational. It corrects the Food and Drug Administration’s mistake in letting Aduhelm onto the market. At the same time, it leaves room for future Alzheimer’s drugs to be covered — as long as studies show they are safe and effective. (Lisa Jarvis, 4/10)

Stat: CMS Made The Wrong Decision On Aduhelm 

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued on Thursday its hotly debated final decision on whether to cover aducanumab (Aduhelm), the first FDA-approved treatment for Alzheimer’s that slows the disease’s biological progression rather than just temporarily easing its symptoms. We believe it made the wrong choice. (Dennis J. Selkoe and Jeffrey Cummings, 4/9)

Stat: Medicare Made The Right Decision To Limit Coverage Of Aduhelm

In a clash of two American health care giants, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had locked horns over Aduhelm, a controversial Alzheimer’s drug. Medicare gained the upper hand on Thursday when it released its final decision to limit coverage of the FDA-approved drug. (John N. Mafi and Catherine Sarkisian, 4/8)

The Washington Post: Medicare Was Right To Limit Coverage For Pricey New Alzheimer’s Drug 

The decision by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to decline to pay for an expensive new Alzheimer’s drug unless people who take it are part of a clinical trial was taken as a defeat by some advocates for Alzheimer’s patients. In fact, the decision represents a triumph for the scientific process. That process held firm, despite intense lobbying efforts both by the drug’s maker and by many of those advocates (who are understandably desperate for any new treatment). (Arthur L. Caplan, 4/10)

This is part of the Morning Briefing, a summary of health policy coverage from major news organizations. Sign up for an email subscription.
Newsletter icon

Sign Up For Our Newsletter

Stay informed by signing up for the Morning Briefing and other emails:

Recent Morning Briefings

  • Friday, May 29
  • Thursday, May 28
  • Wednesday, May 27
  • Tuesday, May 26
  • Friday, May 22
  • Thursday, May 21
More Morning Briefings
RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
  • Special Reports
  • Morning Briefing
  • About Us
  • Donate
  • Staff
  • Republish Our Content
  • Contact Us

Follow Us

  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Bluesky
  • TikTok
  • RSS

Sign up for emails

Join our email list for regular updates based on your personal preferences.

Sign up
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy

© 2026 KFF