Perspectives On The FDA’s E-Cigarette Rule
Opinion writers comment on the Food and Drug Administration's new e-cigarette regulations.
The Wall Street Journal:
The FDA’s Vaporous Thinking About E-Cigs
The Food and Drug Administration on Thursday finally released its regulations on electronic cigarettes. The rules, intended to sharply restrict the use of e-cigarettes—which deliver nicotine via a propylene glycol and/or glycerin-based smokeless aerosol—were immediately lauded by many health groups. But these new FDA regulations will actually protect tobacco-cigarette sales at the expense of the public’s health. They will also destroy thousands of small businesses and effectively hand the e-cigarette market over to a small number of large companies, including the tobacco companies. (Michael B. Siegel, 5/5)
The Washington Post:
Why The FDA’s New E-Cigarette Regulations Are A Gift To Big Tobacco (And Could Actually Harm Public Health)
Today the Food and Drug Administration finalized regulations asserting regulatory authority over e-cigarettes and various tobacco products, such as cigars. According to the agency, this rule will help protect public health. Insofar as the rule subjects actual tobacco products to the same regulations as cigarettes, this might be so. But the part of the rule that “deems” e-cigarettes to be tobacco products and subjects them to extensive regulatory requirements is more likely to harm public health than to help it. Big Tobacco, meanwhile, is likely to be pleased with the new regulations. (Jonathan H. Adler, 5/5)
USA Today:
FDA Takes E-Cigs Out Of 'Wild West': Our View
E-cigarettes could turn out to be either a savior that helps addicted smokers quit or a lure that hooks a whole new generation on nicotine. While science tries to decode those conflicting signals, the federal government took the responsible step Thursday to regulate electronic cigarettes in a way that tries to head off the worst outcome while still allowing potential benefits of vaping to emerge. (5/5)
USA Today:
FDA Went Way Too Far On E-Cigarettes: Opposing View
The FDA wasn’t wrong to regulate e-cigarettes. It was wrong to effectively ban, by its own estimate, up to 98.5% of the e-cigarettes on the market today. E-cigarettes, Public Health England says, are about 95% less harmful than smoking, are not a gateway to smoking, and could help smokers quit. (Jeff Stier, 5/5)
Bloomberg:
Ban E-Cigarette Ads Everywhere
It may come as a disappointment to Europeans who enjoy watching the Marlboro man ride on the open plain (update: He now appears to be a woman, and uses a helicopter), but it’s terrific news for Europe’s health: Within a few weeks, ads for electronic cigarettes will go dark on European TV, radio and websites, and will disappear from most print publications. (5/5)